Club Q Victims Lawsuits Say Shooting Could Have Been Prevented

Survivors of the Club Q shooting and their family members have filed two civil lawsuits against government officials and the nightclub itself for failing to take adequate measures to prevent the tragic shooting. One of the lawsuits was filed by eight survivors of the shooting, while the other was filed by Barrett Hudson, who sustained several gunshot wounds during the attack. The plaintiffs allege that the El Paso County Board of Commissioners could have prevented the shooting if they had enforced the state’s “red flag law” against the gunman Anderson Lee Aldrich. The lawsuits also claim that Club Q’s owners did not take security at the venue seriously. Both lawsuits were filed on November 17, just two days shy of the second anniversary of the attack. Colorado’s red flag law, otherwise known as the Extreme Risk Protection Order, allows for a family member, friend, or police officer to petition a judge for an emergency order to temporarily seize a person’s firearms if they are deemed a risk to themselves or others. Pro-gun lobbyists and a number of sheriffs oppose the law, believing that it violates a person’s constitutional rights. In 2019, a year before the law came into effect and three years before the tragic Club Q shooting, the Board of El Paso County Commissioners approved a resolution to designate the county a so-called “Second Amendment Sanctuary.”

On the 2nd anniversary of the Club Q shooting, family members and survivors are calling for accountability in new lawsuits. https://t.co/tT7g3P5qHT — KRDO13 (@KRDO_13) November 20, 2024

The lawsuits allege that “the shooter had a history of violent threats,” including being charged in 2021 with felony menacing and first-degree kidnapping after making a bomb threat, “which clearly warranted intervention.” However, in July, only four months before the ClubQ shooting, all charges against Aldrich were dropped. The Club Q lawsuits allege that former sheriff Bill Elder’s decision not to use the state’s red flag laws against the shooter created or increased the danger that led to the tragedy. Aldrich had reportedly expressed intentions to become a “mass killer,” yet he retained access to the weapons he used to carry out the shooting. In addition to naming authorities, the lawsuits hold Club Q and its owners responsible for security lapses. The suits allege that in the years prior to the shooting, Club Q cut its security staff from five employees (including an armed guard) to a single worker who also held multiple roles at the club, including food running and barbacking. Attorneys representing the families and victims for the second lawsuit told reporters that they are not pursuing the case for compensation but for “justice and systemic reform.” “The Club Q shooting occurred because of the violent actions of a single individual,” both suits state. “However, this tragedy was also enabled by systemic failures: a refusal to utilize Colorado’s Red Flag Law, which could have prevented the shooter from possessing firearms, and inadequate security measures at Club Q.” The shooter pled guilty to 74 federal hate crimes and firearms charges and will spend the rest of his life in prison. Yet, in the wake of the two-year anniversary of the Club Q shooting in Colorado Springs and staring down four years of another Trump presidency, it’s hard to understand what progress we’ve made—if any—against anti-LGBTQ+ violence and rhetoric. Photo courtesy of social media